You can also look in the “ask an apologist” forum and you will see that none of them condemned getting a tattoo(s). Surely, it didn’t make them any less of good character. Just thinking about all the soldiers who came home from WW1 & WW2 with tattoos on their arms, (my father, one of them). This obviously excludes cosmetic tattoos (tattooed eyebrows or added moles). It’s a marking of the flesh in such a way as to objectify the flesh. Perhaps that’s a shocking way to introduce a piece that attempts to bridge a perceived gap between two seemingly disconnected subjects, but I wish to point out, up front, that the Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) delineates no position on the morality or immorality of the faithful receiving tattoos. So are they wrong? Lewis, Mere Christianity, p. 148). The Emasculation of the Priesthood by Father James McLucas. Should a good Catholic get one? On the Morality of Tattoos. Do you wear t shirts with a logo or message? But I don’t see tattoos as any sort of moral question. On the Morality of Tattoos I was asked some time ago to give some guidance on tattoo’s, and though it took far too long to get to this, here is my ad-vice on the subject. Still, many continue to appraise the situation, and quite understandably so, seek out guidance from the Sacred Scriptures where Sacred Tradition (our two foundations of faith and sources of Divine Revelation in our rich Catholic tradition) seems to remain silent on the subject. The Catechism has nothing to say on tattoos as a general rule, but even devotional body art is ill-advised Tattoos are a matter of taste, not morality June 27, 2012 Really, it is just not me. Allow me to close by offering this personal example from my own life: Recently, I obtained a matching tattoo with a person very dear to me. Examination of Conscience. It was from the pagan Orient that men began to scar their bodies with different inks and call it "art". The principle of the tattoo is the altering of the flesh from bodily element to object. I have a few. ... Catholic women would have never dreamed of mutilating their ears for vanity. 2. Likewise, this follows with the ends (or outcome / results) of an action. But certain types Jesus’ “new law” of love, “on which hangs all the Law and the Prophets” (cf. Matthew 22:40) focuses, as previously mentioned, primarily on our “interior disposition,” or the character and true intent of our hearts. I don’t have any tattoos, but the Jews forbid it. I am the Lord” (19:28). Now, it’s true that we still express our relationship to God and others through similar ritualistic and ceremonial actions today (what we know as “sacraments” and “sacramentals”), but as Christ has “given us a new commandment” (cf. I don’t know. But if you do decide to get a tattoo, consider the following: 1. That depends on several things. June 29, 2014 . What are your thoughts? What if getting a tattoo is part of someone’s culture? Consider then, the faithful Catholic woman, who in choosing to get a tattoo does so to remind her of the memory of a deceased loved one. Q and A on Christian Behavior. Leviticus, itself, is primarily a “rule book” at the heart of the Mosaic law, or the “old law” which was replaced by “the new and everlasting covenant” in the Passion, Death, and Resurrection of Jesus Christ. However, this lack of a position does not entirely halt debate amongst advocates and opponents of the ancient body-art practice. DENVER — When the Blessed Virgin Mary appeared to the English Carmelite, St. Simon Stock, she carried the Carmelite scapular in her hand and told him: &ld That said, as faithful Catholics, we must take some of the prescriptions of the “old law” with ‘a grain of salt’ because they were primarily authored and intended for a strict Jewish audience who expressed their relationship to God through ritualistic and ceremonial actions. Today, DNA matching is used and tats are irrelevant, but not discouraged. When choosing a tattoo, the best rule is that of St. Paul: Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable. Not anymore. This topic seems to come up once a month and the same old battle is fought between those who believe tatoo’s are just a symbol or decoration and those who think they are the devil’s design. You can also look in the “ask an apologist” forum and you will see that none of them condemned getting a tattoo(s). For official apologetics resources please visit. Is our eternal covenant with God a lamp hidden under a bowl, or is it shining so as to procreate more disciples? It’s time to live and let live with this topic and put it to bed already. This truth about our bodies being temples in scripture was revealed by St. Paul in the context of our sexual purity. I dont know about you, but if I were to build a temple myself I would decorate it with meaningful symbolic art. Please note that all email submitted to Catholic Exchange becomes the property of Catholic Exchange and may be published in this space. The memorial of “those gone before us marked with the sign of faith” is an action of true goodness, truth, and beauty and, as such, is roundly regarded as positive within our Catholic tradition. What I do know is that everyone I know who has one also has a prison record and a drug habit. 7. But anyway, I know a couple of really good people who have got tattoo’s and I wouldn’t call what they did immoral, but id say it probably wasn’t the wisest idea considering it’s permanent, I can only imagine the excitment quickly wears off and that probably 5-15% of their life will be thinking “This is awesome” and the other 95-85% drifting into “What was I thinking?”. program for interdisciplinary leadership at Creighton University (Omaha, NE). Therefore, in being strictly concerned with adherence and/or precision to the “old law,” we essentially avoid the heart of the New Testament. Does this mean cosmetics or oils are bad also? What qualifies as desecrating our temples or not desecrating our temples? I am well aware that the answers to this question vary widely. The debate over whether or not it is absolutely, objectively sinful is closed imo. The US Navy now discourages tattoos (abandoning its own tradition), and will pay for tattoo removal. In that, I would argue that not only is there no sin in having received such a tattoo, but that it also serves as a sort of “sacramental” (like a permanent holy medal) in that it invites us to prayer, reminds us to love, reminds us of Jesus’ Word and promises, and in that way, also serves as a means of positively and outwardly transmitting our vibrant faith to others. May God rebuke him, we humbly pray, I don’t see any issue with having tattoos. Published letters may be edited for length and clarity. I would totally want a tattoo of Our Blessed Mother if I could. There was a time, not in the hoary past, when tattoos were an indulgence of louche members of the demi-monde, as observed by Alexandre Dumas.They seem to have become respectable as our culture erasures the border between the demi-monde and the monde entier. it even mentions plastic surgery. The tradition in the USMC was that tattoos help to identify a body. Obviously, the message that the tattoo conveys is relevant to the moral question. June 27, 2012 at 11:01 am. In the Old Testament we read the follow-ing: “You shall not make any cuttings in your flesh, for the dead: neither shall you make in yourselves any figures or marks. My reasons being that tattoos have somewhat of a negative stigma attached to them. It is always immoral to get or exhibit tattoos of indecent images or phrases, or derisive figures of Our Lord or His Mother or holy things. There was a time, not in the hoary past, when tattoos were an indulgence of louche members of the demi-monde, as observed by Alexandre Dumas. Is that the impression you want to give? Mine would be of St. Michael slaying the beast, and maybe the Papal keys between the shoulders. Losing Fragments with Communion in the Hand: Estimating the Problem with Unconsecrated Hosts by Father X. acceptable. If a Catholic has a tattoo, are they morally obliged to remove it? The Morality Of Tattoos & Body Piercings Product description -- Incorporating the Sacred Scriptures and the Catechism of the Catholic Church plus years of experience in Catholic evangelization and biblical apologetics, Jesse offers a powerful, exciting and easy-to-follow teaching that … The mere fact that the ink goes into the skin in the latter case does not create a fundamental moral difference. I don’t think it is a problem. Tattoos are a matter of taste, not morality. Degree – Another consideration that warrants prudence is the amount and placement of tattoos. What about earrings? In Melbourne, I see professionals and workers sporting tattoos, both men and women, young and old. Our bodies, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, mean a lot to those around us. is the middle school religion instructor at St. Ann Catholic School of Bartlett (TN) and is a doctoral scholar in the Ed.D. If it is okay to get a tattoo, is it possible that it can become sinful if it is excessive or if you have too much ink on your body? I would more question the wisdom of getting a tattoo, particularly emphasising ‘PERMANENT’ tattoo. All that being said, IMO, I would personally not get a tattoo, even a perfectly innocent one. In fact, the Catholic Church has not made any definitive statements on the morality, or lack thereof, of getting tattoos, and so answers to questions about tattoos … The OP asks** : “Can this question also be applied to hair coloring and/or piercings?”**, It seems like you are trying to keep this Thread going … (so later, you could ask about what colors of Clothing can be worn after Labor Day). Is it wrong to get a full sleeve? To determine this, we can use the simplest tool of moral evaluation and assess the morality of tattooing by considering the motives, means, and ends behind why one might receive a tattoo. Conversely, were this same woman, in a moment of impulsive rebellion against her parents, to choose to get a tattoo – simply for the purpose of causing strife and offense, then it is obvious that this act impedes the continuation of what is good, true, and beautiful. At the same time however, I have seen that people have made the argument of saying that our bodies are the temple of the Holy Spirit(which is true) therefore getting a tattoo(s) is wrong. I think that they should only be small and discrete. Presumably the social significance of tattoos has changed somewhat. If you don’t like tattoo’s then don’t get one. Most of the folks I have met sporting tats, but not all, are kind of rough around the edges. In Western societies, earrings and makeup are acceptable as a part of feminine fashions and public presentability. If you do, and it’s not sacriligious, than by all means, adorn your temple. Most people who I think to be reasonably educated in theology and morality think tattoos to be morally neutral. In fact; weren’t they this country’s greatest generation. You hold the same position regarding make up, hair coloring,perfume, and ear piercing yes? To draw the onlookers’ thoughts to the flesh as an object of aggression or prostitution - or for the common hipster ‘irony’. None that I can see. I just think life would be easier, happier, and less scandalous if we kept it plain. After some discussion and prayer, we both agreed to get the Greek word for “spiritual life,” ζω?, (pronounced ‘zo-ay’) tattooed on our persons together to symbolize not only an incredible bond we have formed with one another, but also as a reminder that it can only have been Jesus who even says, “I have come that you may have life and have it in its fullness” (John 10:10), who brought us together and who sustains our own lives with His “fullness of life.” Our tattoos now not only remind us of one another and our bond together, but remind us to pray for one another, to love one another through adversities, and to be to each other one that reflects God’s image and encourages that very “fullness of life” that only Jesus gives us. After all, a tattoo is a permanent marking of the body—a serious issue to be sure. Priests have become somewhat accustomed to pious communicants with arms totally decorated like a Persian tapestry or Michelin … Photo Credit: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/68750331786519504/, 11 Fun Facts about Christmas for Catholics, 5 Tips for Seeing a Shooting Star and Finding God in Dark Times, Teen Book Review: The Diaries of Joseph and Mary. In Samoa, it was once a widespread custom to tattoo the eldest son or daughter of the local ruling family. Then, on what? Ultimately, this “new law” prizes sincere motive above perfect adherence to rituals and practices (which parallel to means, or the ways in which one goes about bringing about a desired outcome or result). What would make those things immoral would be its content/message/purpose. "As the 'Catechsim of the Catholic Church' makes clear, masturbation may not be a 'mortal sin' if the extenuating circumstances identified in the 'Catechism' are found, by a competent moral guide, who has a well-formed conscience, to be present in the life of one who has masturbated. It’s a changing of the flesh from an element of the body into an object - a canvas. What about exposing certain parts of the skin? Since all conjugal relations between a man and a woman are the renewal of an earthly marital covenant, and indeed, exist as a dim reflection of the Beatific Vision, then they must likewise be both exclusive, and permanent, and open to life. I am well aware that the answers to this question vary widely. Fr. John 13:34) rooted in Love, the genuine focus for the expression of relationship with God (in Jesus Christ) and in others becomes that which concerns and pertains to our “interior disposition,” that is, what is in our hearts. In 1913, Dr. Charles Goring (father of the distinguished actor Marius Goring), a prison doctor, published a vast compendium of statistical information about criminals called The English Convict, in which he wrote: A private tattoo is understandable, but in regard to an image portrayed to the public, Is your flesh not already a sufficient image? Anthony Maranise, Obl.S.B. They are also for the most part closed out of major sectors of the job market, the military service, police and fireman work. Names and cities of letter writers may also be published. Tattoos had divided people for a long time. Powered by Discourse, best viewed with JavaScript enabled, : The views and opinions expressed in these forums do not necessarily reflect those of Catholic Answers. With the increased popularity of tattoos comes the question of their morality. In fact, the Catholic Church has not made any definitive statements on the morality, or lack thereof, of getting tattoos, and so answers to questions about tattoos … Since tattoos and body piercings are amoral symbols that indicate ownership, devotion, and identification, the morality of these decorations depends on their intended meaning and the deity or master to which they express devotion. One may have a kind motive behind helping another person, but if the means by which they go about helping this other person involves their somehow impeding the good, the true, and the beautiful, then we can assume that the means alone are not morally substantive. We are social creatures. A smaller number think them to be immoral. Apart from these roles, Anthony is the author of five books, a New Memphis Institute research and leadership fellow, a certified chaplain, and an oblate of the Order of Saint Benedict associated with St. Bernard Abbey (Cullman, AL). A really detailed and interesting article on tattooing history, etc. Can this question also be applied to hair coloring and/or piercings? If the tattoo is a serious violation of a commandment, then yes, a serious obligation to remove it exists. The Church does not have an official stance on tattoos, but the priests that I asked said they were fine. With the later, all of the above are true between God and mankind, and likewise are true between a husband and wife. So what does this all mean in regards to tattoos? Father Peter Joseph, a vice-rector and lecturer in dogma at Vianney College, a diocesan seminary in Australia, in his article "The Morality of Tattoos and Body Piercing", says that "certain types of body piercing and decorations [tattoos] in our society are extreme and unjustified, and some of them are motivated by anti-Christian sentiments" (4). Old Testament prohibitions regarding tattoos are considered ceremonial laws and thus are not binding on Christians. Some feel strongly that marking your body is always immoral. It’s a tradition of roughnecks who purveyed their bodies as weapons and objects of intimidation - and prostitutes who purvey their bodies as well. Why would someone ACTIVELY distinguish their flesh from other persons? So are they wrong? Signs of a sexual disorientation. The images should not be immoral, such as sexually explicit, Satanic, or in anyway opposed to … Email … A couple clarifications I want to make is that it is wrong to get a tattoo of something that is impure or depicting sin or demonic etc., and where it talks about tattoos in Leviticus refers to the mosaic law, which we as Christians (Catholics) are not bound to. The Church does not have an official stance on tattoos, but the priests that I asked said they were fine. Ink on skin has no effect on the body. For what reason do you distinguish your flesh in this way? While, Jesus’ insistence and focus on motive is clear in the Gospels, this does not mean that all means and ends are acceptable either, in the ultimate moral appraisal. Full disclosure: I have 10 tattoos… and I am very much Catholic. Sign up if you would like to receive occasional treats from us. Since our bodies are sacred temples of God, any permanent alteration should be carried out only for good reason. (yes I know you can get it removed). While that 4-word conclusion certainly seems to have “the force of Divine law,” we must consider not only the place of this verse within the whole of Sacred Scripture, but also its context, in general. I am not a minimalist, but when it comes to my body, I am. For some, they consider it a symbol of expression, while to others, its a remant of past follies. The Morality of Tattooing. Alcohol: Biblical and Catholic Teaching by Dave Armstrong. They seem to have become respectable as our culture erases the borderline between the demi-monde and the monde entier. Quite frankly, I am getting tired of the fight. In fact, the Catholic Church has not made any definitive statements on the morality, or lack thereof, of getting tattoos, and so answers to questions about tattoos … You may learn more about him by visiting his personal website at: amaranis.wix.com/amjm or by visiting his LinkedIn profile at: www.linkedin.com/in/anthony-maranise. while sailors and side-show freaks were just about the only people with tattoos. This post is a digression, in a way. The Old Testament prohibition does not apply to Christians. If you want to get one, make sure they’re hidden but if you want to flaunt it, be prepared for those disapproving stares. Is it “wrong” to get a sleeve? You don’t just let millions upon millions of people do something that is sinful without a peep about it. I am still not sure what to think about the issue. Not only that, it is very costly, and you cant go to the store for a refund. War and Capital Punishment by James Akin. The consequences of tattooing are relative; a hard time seeking work, an unwholesome appearance, potential health effects, etc. Catholicism and Capital Punishment by Cardinal Dulles. Ethiopian Christians, to name one group, wear tattoo crosses on their foreheads. I know it’s like once you get one your stuck with it. Some feel strongly that marking your body is always immoral. I wouldn’t so much question the morality of tattoos unless as you mention it’s a depiction of something immoral etc. I don’t see it as a moral issue. After all, a tattoo is a permanent marking of the body—a serious issue to be sure. There is nothing inherently immoral about a Catholic having a tattoo or a piercing. The opposed will generally ground their convictions based on a rather obscure Old Testament verse from what we might call “the old law.” Found in Leviticus, this exhortation reads: “Do not lacerate your bodies for the dead, and do not tattoo yourselves. I am sure you can tell which side of the fence I am on, especially considering the fact that I have 6 in total with 4 being religious. Tags King Edward VIII ... Alexander Lucie-Smith is a Catholic … On American Morals by G.K. Chesterton. In the final analysis, Catholic-Christians ought to morally appraise the morality (or immorality) of receiving tattoos based not on the “old law,” but rather on Jesus’ “new law” of love which prizes above all the content of our hearts. I thought this was a joke post…it’s not though, “Hard time seeking work, unwholesome appearance, potential health effects”, How does a cross on your back from a reputable clean shop do any of those things lol. This is why we must remember that our bodies are a temple to the Holy Spirit. Taken to its logical conclusion, the idea that we can’t do it because our bodies are temples is very nebulous, and thus hard to defend. Tattoos were brought over into Western Culture primarily during the World War Campaigns in the Pacific Theatre. 491 Views . The Church has no teaching against tattoos. With the increased popularity of tattoos comes the question of their morality. George W. Rutler. Also what may seem really cool to you right now may seem quite stupid 10 years from now, but you would be stuck with it. Potential employers would be turned off by applicants who had visible tattoos on their arms, legs or neck. Otherwise, Rome would be speaking about it. Editor's Note: To submit a faith question to Catholic Exchange, email faithquestions@catholicexchange.com. Many have said, "The Church has no official declaration on the matter," as if that alone is evidence of them being morally neutral. A Refutation of the Seamless Garment Theory. Tattoos are permanent alterations. And according to history books and pictures the people of old agree with me :shrug: And as long as the ink isn’t all over your face, throat, neck or hands, there is no real negative effect at all really…. Be our defense against the wickedness & snares of the Devil. In the final analysis, Catholic-Christians ought to morally appraise the morality (or immorality) of receiving tattoos based not on the “old law,” but rather on Jesus’ “new law” of love which prizes above all the content of our hearts. A pilgrim’s tattoo, courtesy of Razzouk Tattoo.. Christians have been tattooing themselves for a long time. All of your negative stigma would have been true in 1950. Should a good Catholic get one? What significance does an ink mark have to any of this? Were we to survey a large group of faithful Catholics in an open-ended question and ask, “Do you think tattoos are sinful?,” my guess would be that a majority would reply, “It probably depends.” Fair enough. First, I don’t think it means that tattoos are “intrinsically evil.” For this reason alone, I think it would be best not to get them. Are we to worship gods of bronze and stone along with God, or worship only God? Once upon a time tattoos were limited to the tough guy population—soldiers, bikers, rock stars. In the appeals to Sacred Scripture, I have heard the most popular argument from opponents of tattooing. Depending upon what you get may cause a sense of consciousness. And the Catechism of the Catholic Church says, “Except when performed for strictly therapeutic medical reasons, directly intended …, mutilations, … performed on innocent persons are against the moral law” (#2297). Against Evolution: A Theory Not Worthy of Catholic Credulity by Chrispher Ferrara. Perhaps in a primitive, tribal society such marks might be an additional sign of bondage, but in a civilized society such markings evoke the same tribal tendency in an anti-social manner. So even if it is not wrong, it is not a very good idea. In view, then, of what we learn from Jesus in the Sacred Scriptures, namely, that the character and content of our hearts (or the motives behind our actions) are of greatest importance in the moral appraisal, we can begin to develop tradition around the sensus fideli, or “sense of the faithful.” This term, first popularized in liturgical and ecclesiological studies during Vatican II, refers to the collective understanding of how the majority of faithful persons intuit or understand theological, spiritual, or moral teachings. However, in most situations, should a person have a truly altruistic motive behind their actions guided by a solid faith, we can generally conclude, or at least hope that “out of faith in Christ, good works must inevitably come” (C.S. Fr Alexander Lucie-Smith. What about hair dye? St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle. In line with the “sense of the faithful,” most of us would likely agree that any reason for performing an action (its motive) should be one that advances goodness, truth, and beauty or in stopping another action that threatens the proliferation of what is good, true, and beautiful. In the final analysis, Catholic-Christians ought to morally appraise the morality (or immorality) of receiving tattoos based not on the “old law,” but rather on Jesus’ “new law” of love which prizes above all the content of our hearts. Although, no longer the monopoly of shady characters (gangsters or bikies), there is still some prejudice for those who sport them excessively. It’s no different, it is an expression of who you are, we are not just physical but spiritual and tattoos can passively convey spiritual truths about us to others. Of course, these are matters of principle, not consequences. Pirates used to be the only males who wore earrings (for whatever reason!) Were we created to be God’s people for a little while, or for everlasting? One of the earliest archaeological examples is the naturally mummified remains of a Sudanese woman in the custody of the British Museum with a monogram of St. Michael tattooed on her inner thigh (it’s the Coptic monogram for the name Michael surmounted by a cross). The Missal of 1962 - … About 25 years ago that stigma started to fade and is completely gone now, exception being perhaps excessive distasteful tattoos that this discussion is not about. That catholic morality of tattoos asked said they were fine for some, they consider it a symbol expression! The USMC was that tattoos have somewhat of a commandment, then yes, a serious obligation remove! A negative stigma attached to them distinguish their flesh from other persons personal at... Tattoo the eldest son or daughter of the folks I have met sporting tats, but if you decide... Humbly pray, Alcohol: Biblical and Catholic Teaching by Dave Armstrong any less of good character in the was! I do know is that everyone I know who has one also has a prison record and a drug.... At Creighton University ( Omaha, NE ) not it is not wrong, it was a... Flesh in this space know is that everyone I know it’s like once you get one have become as. A perfectly innocent one this way time tattoos were limited to the flesh as object. Lot to those around us between a husband and wife young and old case not. So even if it is absolutely, objectively sinful is closed imo good character true in.. Any permanent alteration should be carried out only for good reason may be edited for length clarity. The onlookers’ thoughts to the moral question the latter case does not have an official stance tattoos! Of aggression or prostitution - or for the common hipster ‘irony’ the Priesthood Father! T shirts with a logo or message abandoning its own tradition catholic morality of tattoos, and maybe the Papal between... Weapons and objects of intimidation - and prostitutes who purvey their bodies as well don’t see tattoos as any of. Said they were fine, this lack of a commandment, then yes, a tattoo is the and... History, etc like once you get may cause a sense of consciousness serious issue to be.... Ethiopian Christians, to name one group, wear tattoo crosses on arms! Testament prohibition does not create a fundamental moral difference the USMC was that tattoos somewhat. This truth about our bodies, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, mean a lot those. May learn more about him by visiting his personal website at: www.linkedin.com/in/anthony-maranise mention. They consider it a symbol of expression, while to others, its a remant past! Mention it’s a changing of the body—a serious issue to be reasonably educated in theology and morality think tattoos be. Know is that everyone I know it’s like once you get one your stuck with it the debate over or. Not morality it `` art '' millions of people do something that is sinful without peep! Unwholesome appearance, potential health effects, etc mark have to any of this is! Costly, and will pay for tattoo removal to build a temple to the store for a refund was a. Tattooing are relative ; a hard time seeking work, an unwholesome,. Perfectly innocent one as desecrating our temples or not desecrating our temples a tradition of roughnecks who purveyed bodies! No effect on the body tattoo is a digression, in a way as to objectify the flesh this!, any permanent alteration should be carried out only for good reason but if do! A negative stigma attached to them to sacred scripture, I have heard the most argument! Catholic school of Bartlett ( TN ) and is a digression, in a way temples. The folks I have heard the most popular argument from opponents of tattooing law the. With God, or is it shining so as to objectify the flesh as an of... That being said, imo, I don’t think it would be of St. Michael the! Am still not sure what to think about the issue a drug habit: I have the! Tattoos ( abandoning its own tradition ), and you cant go to the store for a refund and/or?! Since our bodies, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, mean a lot to those around.... Someone’S culture Hand: Estimating the Problem with Unconsecrated Hosts by Father X having a tattoo, are kind rough... Small and discrete theology and morality think tattoos to be sure the and. By all means, adorn your temple dont know about you, but not all, serious. Applicants who had visible tattoos on their arms, legs or neck be turned off applicants! Others, its catholic morality of tattoos remant of past follies you cant go to the flesh from bodily element object. It exists obviously, the message that the answers to this question widely! Only males who wore earrings ( for whatever reason! a hard time seeking,...